Oh yeah. User-agent stylesheets and a list of links. The pinnacle of human-centered design. /s The author either doesn't understand design or has a very low-bar for tactically good user-centered experiences, or both.
I can list an endless list of bad things on this website:
- Bad information architecture.
- Poor contextualization, narrative, and direction of a message (just because it's Berkshire Hathaway, doesn't mean that I automatically know what I'm trying to find in their website)
- Poor document structure that renders at the whole width of wide screens and doesn't wrap for small screens.
- Bad typography and typographic scale (can a visually impaired person read the small text that shows dates and footnotes?)
- Bad use of color. Everything is blue, the links are purple. Usually in plain stylesheets blue is reserved for links and purple for clicked links.
- External links don't open in a new tab.
- No branding. Can a user trust that this is an official website?
- No navigational elements (navbar, breadcrumbs, etc) that allow a user to return to the main page (which is supposed to be the "master class of human-centered design). Every click is a dead-end.
- Multiple SEO and accessibility issues:
- Does not have a <meta name="viewport"> tag with width or
initial-scaleNo `<meta name="viewport">` tag found. Document
does not have a meta description
- Text is illegible because there's no viewport meta tag
optimized for mobile screens.
- Tap targets are too small because there's no viewport meta
tag optimized for mobile screens
- The page does not contain a heading, skip link, or
landmark region
I can list an endless list of bad things on this website:
- Bad information architecture.
- Poor contextualization, narrative, and direction of a message (just because it's Berkshire Hathaway, doesn't mean that I automatically know what I'm trying to find in their website)
- Poor document structure that renders at the whole width of wide screens and doesn't wrap for small screens.
- Bad typography and typographic scale (can a visually impaired person read the small text that shows dates and footnotes?)
- Bad use of color. Everything is blue, the links are purple. Usually in plain stylesheets blue is reserved for links and purple for clicked links.
- External links don't open in a new tab.
- No branding. Can a user trust that this is an official website?
- No navigational elements (navbar, breadcrumbs, etc) that allow a user to return to the main page (which is supposed to be the "master class of human-centered design). Every click is a dead-end.
- Multiple SEO and accessibility issues: