SCOTUS did not shut off extended absentee voting. They weren't even asked to comment on it. They were asked to comment on a decision by a federal judge that went above and beyond what the initial question to that court was. No one asked the district court to extend the election date, but they did anyway. SCOTUS said courts can't do that. They can only extend the date if they had been asked to do that. No one asked. Please don't twist the truth. SCOTUS explicitly stated that they're not answering the question of whether or not the date can be extended.
This is good. The powers of the Supreme Court are -- and should remain -- limited. We should not welcome authoritarianism simply at the service of convenience or even safety.
What should have happened is the Wisconsin state legislature should have met and extended the ballot. They are the sole entity that is blameworthy in this fiasco. Their decision would have been unquestionable in front of any court. We should stop expecting the courts to be able to rule by fiat. That is not their purpose, rightly so.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19a1016_o759.pdf
This is good. The powers of the Supreme Court are -- and should remain -- limited. We should not welcome authoritarianism simply at the service of convenience or even safety.
What should have happened is the Wisconsin state legislature should have met and extended the ballot. They are the sole entity that is blameworthy in this fiasco. Their decision would have been unquestionable in front of any court. We should stop expecting the courts to be able to rule by fiat. That is not their purpose, rightly so.