Square bans the use of its service for debt collection. The ruling says doing so is a violation of civil rights.
Does this actually strengthen rights for minorities or does it dilute those right by including bill collectors under the law?
Edit: as pointed out below, I am extrapolating from a ruling on standing an implication that has not explicitly been decided one way or another. I have done this so strongly that what I posted in the second sentence above is essentially false. I'll leave it as full disclosure of my error.
Does this actually strengthen rights for minorities or does it dilute those right by including bill collectors under the law?
Edit: as pointed out below, I am extrapolating from a ruling on standing an implication that has not explicitly been decided one way or another. I have done this so strongly that what I posted in the second sentence above is essentially false. I'll leave it as full disclosure of my error.