> It's interesting to me that you find this surprising or view it as bad behavior.
It's not surprising in the sense that it fits the definition of a "nation state".
It's surprising because one would think that in XXI century, people understood that global problems require global coordination; competition of selfish actors fails spectacularly in such cases.
It's not surprising in the sense that it fits the definition of a "nation state".
It's surprising because one would think that in XXI century, people understood that global problems require global coordination; competition of selfish actors fails spectacularly in such cases.