I don't even understand this rhetoric. You can't 'bailout' workers. You can send workers cash, which the government does, but you also should help businesses, because that's where people go to work in the first place.
I'm not really sure what the purpose of this antagonism is, as if protecting employment isn't in the interest of workers, or as if helping businesses and workers is mutually exclusive.
I'm not really sure what the purpose of this antagonism is, as if protecting employment isn't in the interest of workers, or as if helping businesses and workers is mutually exclusive.