As far as I understand, local storage provisioner is for the node local storage; the storage doesn't follow the workload to whatever node is the pod scheduled, but schedules the pod to the node containing the storage device. It doesn't allow for pods to access local storage outside the node.
So for worker nodes using storage on the master node, isn't it better to use either iSCSI or NFS?
As far as I understand, local storage provisioner is for the node local storage; the storage doesn't follow the workload to whatever node is the pod scheduled, but schedules the pod to the node containing the storage device. It doesn't allow for pods to access local storage outside the node.
So for worker nodes using storage on the master node, isn't it better to use either iSCSI or NFS?