Did you read my entire comment? Feel like I addressed this here:
> We already have small pilot studies showing this stuff that have the same problems. Repeated science is often underrated, but these results are uncontroversial, they are just over interpreted and old.
In general I am strongly in favor of reproducing science, this study doesn't really test anything helpful for either outcome though.
> We already have small pilot studies showing this stuff that have the same problems. Repeated science is often underrated, but these results are uncontroversial, they are just over interpreted and old.
In general I am strongly in favor of reproducing science, this study doesn't really test anything helpful for either outcome though.