Comment

Comment by stoicShell

There is one word missing from this post that contains a whole lot of the argument on the environment side: chaos.

Those who learn to thrive in chaos are most dangerous out there, for they have this contrarian impulse to rise when there's blood in the streets. If you recall a history lesson or two, that's how the most egregious powers are made —in wealth or might or legacy.

Right now, some of us are down —the situation is draining, energy-wise— whereas others feel invigorated, a drive to take action, make a move.

How we respond to chaos thus creates a big divide among us in times of major perturbation. There's this shift of potentials in the system, and kinetics go crazy, and some flee/freeze (seek security, refuge, maintaining the status quo, conservatively preserve what's left, etc) while others feel compelled to fight (to defend, protect, help; but also attack, kick in the disruptive nuts, solve problem, seek victory). For those, it could be the perfect storm to attempt a moonshot — I find there's a really unusual proportion of such stories among famous successful figures in virtually all fields, but I wonder if it's not survivorship bias + myth building + my own filters.

parent stoicShell 6 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton