Examining this case from a "similarity to employee" perspective neglects a crucial factor: the expectations between the parties at the time of contract.
It's patently obvious no Uber driver expected to be treated as an employee, as no employment contract was signed, and the Uber model is known and clear.
The court merely implements "social justice", which is nor social nither justice, destroying basic trust in society. Progressivism is cancer.
It's patently obvious no Uber driver expected to be treated as an employee, as no employment contract was signed, and the Uber model is known and clear.
The court merely implements "social justice", which is nor social nither justice, destroying basic trust in society. Progressivism is cancer.