Painfully ironic that the static landing page for a service offering to improve website performance (by adding more technology) scores a miserable 66% on mobile and 90% on desktop with Google's PageSpeed Insights[0]. I honestly didn't realise static sites could score so poorly.
I'm assuming this is targeted at a non-technical audience (although posting to HN would suggest otherwise), but I suppose it could provide some benefit under ideal conditions.
Including a 24kb font for the three "pep" letters in the heading just tops off the eternal face-palming. Incredible.
I'm assuming this is targeted at a non-technical audience (although posting to HN would suggest otherwise), but I suppose it could provide some benefit under ideal conditions.
Including a 24kb font for the three "pep" letters in the heading just tops off the eternal face-palming. Incredible.
[0] https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=...