Comment Comment by CoreDumpling The interpreter we wrote in that actually wasn't written for Emacs, it was written for TECO. It was our text editor, and was an extremely ugly programming language, as ugly as could possibly be.For proof, see the source code here: http://pdp-10.trailing-edge.com/mit_emacs_170_teco_1220/inde...It is certainly heavily annotated for good reason. parent CoreDumpling 15 years ago
For proof, see the source code here: http://pdp-10.trailing-edge.com/mit_emacs_170_teco_1220/inde...
It is certainly heavily annotated for good reason.