The central premise of the article is that there is no disclosure regarding the vulnerability used, suggesting the existence of some unknown zero-day exploit..
Various well documented analysis have linked this incident to "EgotisticalGiraffe", a well known -- and since fixed vulnerability.
FUD or lazy journalism? I mean, at least read the subjects Wikipedia page before publishing something..
Various well documented analysis have linked this incident to "EgotisticalGiraffe", a well known -- and since fixed vulnerability.
FUD or lazy journalism? I mean, at least read the subjects Wikipedia page before publishing something..