Comment

Comment by cj

This (again) highlights the need for tech companies to take responsibility for what happens on their platform. And it probably won't happen without increased regulation.

Imagine you build a real-world football stadium. Then, you open the doors up to the public for free with minimal restrictions or rules for how the space is used.

You brand the stadium as a "platform" and you invite the public to treat it as such. 6 months later you have people doing drugs on one side of the stadium, holding a white supremacy rally at the other end of the stadium, and then a group of people in the bleachers playing russian roulette with the occasional casualty.

The police eventually track down the owner of the stadium. The owner says "Yes, I own the stadium, it's my property, but sorry Mr. Police, the stadium is a Platform for free expression. I have no control what the public does in there."

--

Introducing new regulations is usually an unpopular suggestion. It raises the barrier of entry for competitors. It limits the market to players who can afford to comply.

But at a certain point, IMO we should stop giving tech companies a free pass just because they're a "platform" that's "too large to moderate".

parent cj 6 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton