Shouldn't the copyright therefore belong to the robot? The company is therefore not party to the ip infringement case.
Now as an employee my ip belongs to my employer, but I am paid for this.
A robot couldn't enter into a contract without 1) being paid (consideration) or 2) the intention to create a contract. Therefore if robots are to assign copyright they are going to need training about contracts.
Now as an employee my ip belongs to my employer, but I am paid for this.
A robot couldn't enter into a contract without 1) being paid (consideration) or 2) the intention to create a contract. Therefore if robots are to assign copyright they are going to need training about contracts.