The point of insisting what "open source" means is that we want to ensure the freedoms that open source guarantees. If we don't insist on this definition people will start pushing licenses that forbid commercial use and other things, as this license forbids, and we'll embrace it because we think "ah, open source!"
And yes, when you coin a term, you also get to say what that term means. That's the whole point of coining it:
And yes, when you coin a term, you also get to say what that term means. That's the whole point of coining it:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22012429