Comment Comment by Padraig You can have a fast internal development cycle without devaluing the established concept of major version numbers.I don't appreciate this because I make money from software. To me, a new major version number is:a) an indication that there have been major changes. It's not something that increments every 12 weeks.b) something most people reasonably expect to pay for.I know Mozilla isn't first with this approach. It still sucks.Edit: Interesting that it has been driven by the same company that rendered the term 'beta' meaningless.Edit 2: Why the downvotes? parent Padraig 15 years ago
I don't appreciate this because I make money from software. To me, a new major version number is:
a) an indication that there have been major changes. It's not something that increments every 12 weeks.
b) something most people reasonably expect to pay for.
I know Mozilla isn't first with this approach. It still sucks.
Edit: Interesting that it has been driven by the same company that rendered the term 'beta' meaningless.
Edit 2: Why the downvotes?