This is a very disappointing approach I see on HN. Armchair analysis based on sparse information in the article assuming all kinds of things about the avionics, space hardware and rocket physics, condemning an entire team of software engineers that are working on this issue.
Think about this - if you're one of those software engineers and you read some random person on forums criticizing your work without context or thorough understanding, how would you feel?
I love HN for insight and intellectual debate, this kind of analysis does not add any insight - it is flat out dismissing and condescending.
Edit: Also, this behavior against Boeing is unwarranted because it has bias of 737 MAX issues. Completely different team, completely different problem.
Think about this - if you're one of those software engineers and you read some random person on forums criticizing your work without context or thorough understanding, how would you feel?
I love HN for insight and intellectual debate, this kind of analysis does not add any insight - it is flat out dismissing and condescending.
Edit: Also, this behavior against Boeing is unwarranted because it has bias of 737 MAX issues. Completely different team, completely different problem.