but since every device is as persistent as its weakest point (e.g. physical damage, loss/theft, etc) shouldn't apps that need to save essential/important data basically give up the argument of persistence because of using localstorage in the first place? your data is one breakdown/loss away from permanent destruction when using localstorage exclusively.
that is why, from my experience, you always rely on the server and only use localstorage as a backup in case the server is down, there's no internet, etc.
claiming massive loss of data because localstorage got emptied is basically saying "our app wasn't designed correctly".
but since every device is as persistent as its weakest point (e.g. physical damage, loss/theft, etc) shouldn't apps that need to save essential/important data basically give up the argument of persistence because of using localstorage in the first place? your data is one breakdown/loss away from permanent destruction when using localstorage exclusively.
that is why, from my experience, you always rely on the server and only use localstorage as a backup in case the server is down, there's no internet, etc.
claiming massive loss of data because localstorage got emptied is basically saying "our app wasn't designed correctly".
what am i missing?