i have this weird theory in my head that tim is allocating financials internally to either
A: save money and try to let a product die (mac mini, mbp, ipod)
B: invest to signal hope that a product is in fact not dead (mac pro, also mbp)
both approaches will eventually lead to an iphone-ipad-only apple because in case A things just fade away with the occasional life sign as to not lose too many customers.
case B, on the other hand, gives people what they were yearning for for years and keeps „professionals“ and press stimulated but at a ridiculous price point so that, b/c of low sales, the product line can finally be killed.
A: save money and try to let a product die (mac mini, mbp, ipod)
B: invest to signal hope that a product is in fact not dead (mac pro, also mbp)
both approaches will eventually lead to an iphone-ipad-only apple because in case A things just fade away with the occasional life sign as to not lose too many customers.
case B, on the other hand, gives people what they were yearning for for years and keeps „professionals“ and press stimulated but at a ridiculous price point so that, b/c of low sales, the product line can finally be killed.