Very disappointed with (pop-)science books these days. They're basically science history books. The formula is something like 60% (How it all started filler) + 5 % (An essay-worth of original relevant content + 35% (personal stories about conferences and papers).
Looking through some of them on the amazon preview, these seem to be in the same league. Meh.
Looking through some of them on the amazon preview, these seem to be in the same league. Meh.