Can I be controversial and ask what justifies such expenses? Why is this game so important that it needs to be up and running so badly?
From what I've seen so far the "game" (if you can even call it that) highlights the weaknesses of GPT-2 much more than its strengths (the model's answers to user actions are random, the story is incoherent, the world is inconsistent). I don't get the feeling it was setup to demonstrate _weakness_ though. I think it was meant to demonstrate strngths.
I suppose it's just advertising for the BYU Perception, Control and Cognition Lab, but it sounds awfuly expensive for advertising for an academic group.
From what I've seen so far the "game" (if you can even call it that) highlights the weaknesses of GPT-2 much more than its strengths (the model's answers to user actions are random, the story is incoherent, the world is inconsistent). I don't get the feeling it was setup to demonstrate _weakness_ though. I think it was meant to demonstrate strngths.
I suppose it's just advertising for the BYU Perception, Control and Cognition Lab, but it sounds awfuly expensive for advertising for an academic group.