What I fail to understand is this teachers assumption of financial responsibility for an expense outside their contract. What kind of union are they running? Seriously, if all of the teachers simply refused to purchase mandated equipment for their students, the district would either have to assume that responsibility, or change policy. By "doing the best for the students", the teacher allows the district to go unaccountable for their decisions, perpetuating the problem.
I love teachers, family is full of them, and maybe they shouldn't allow themselves to be used so ruthlessly by the state?
I love teachers, family is full of them, and maybe they shouldn't allow themselves to be used so ruthlessly by the state?