Hey guys, at the expense of sounding stupid, please educate me - if a company A pays you a salary X to do your fucking job Y and if you use that money and time on activities Z, especially if it negatively affects company A's image / revenues, why shouldn't the company be allowed to fire you as they're losing significant revenues because you didn't fulfil your contractual obligation to perform Y that you're paid X for?
I'm not taking sides nor talking about what's right, what's wrong, or whether you agree with the company's way of handing something or not. I'm talking simply from a contractual standpoint that you signed on the day of your employment.
If you don't like it, why don't you just quit and then sue the company instead?
I'm not taking sides nor talking about what's right, what's wrong, or whether you agree with the company's way of handing something or not. I'm talking simply from a contractual standpoint that you signed on the day of your employment.
If you don't like it, why don't you just quit and then sue the company instead?