> I do not care about safety (memory or otherwise) - my code doesn't take arbitrary input, run on shared hardware, do much of anything over networks or have memory safety crashes
How do you know it's the case that you don't have memory safety defects in your implementation?
It's almost certainly not the case that you don't care about safety. Out of bounds accesses and writes would make the simulation defective. Defective simulations are useless. However it might make sense if you said that you don't find yourself fixing defects like these often.
How do you know it's the case that you don't have memory safety defects in your implementation?
It's almost certainly not the case that you don't care about safety. Out of bounds accesses and writes would make the simulation defective. Defective simulations are useless. However it might make sense if you said that you don't find yourself fixing defects like these often.