Comment

Comment by breck

From Google Chrome design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U5zqfaJCFj_URrAmSxJ0C7z0...

> "early experimental results in canary/dev channels show the cache hit rate drops by about 4% but changes to first contentful paint aren’t statistically significant and the overall fraction of bytes loaded from the cache only drops from 39.1% to 37.8%."

What about exceptions for loading common JS libraries from a shared CDN? I'm looking at the Google Chrome design doc and don't see how one gets around this. Maybe I'm just missing something, but if not it seems like they need to dig more into perf from the perspective of the slower end of the distribution, it could make a big difference.

parent breck 7 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton