This article make it sounds like I was right. The author just took a ride in a driverless car. Which is limited to driving in Arizona due to legal restrictions.
But to answer your question, we’d need a whole different legal framework about liability for driverless cars instead of technological restrictions.
Like for example, the law ~says~ would say “one person must be designated as legally liable for the vehicle” and that’s it. Drive your driverless car on any road you want. If it hits someone, the designated person is liable.
But to answer your question, we’d need a whole different legal framework about liability for driverless cars instead of technological restrictions.
Like for example, the law ~says~ would say “one person must be designated as legally liable for the vehicle” and that’s it. Drive your driverless car on any road you want. If it hits someone, the designated person is liable.