I have several problems with the CNN article this one is based off of.
1. Why take a screen shot of the spreadsheet?
2. Why are there only 11 amateurs? Amateurs greatly out number pro but in this table they're a minority. Seems like sample bias to me.
3. Where is the context and the history? The bloggers all predicted larger increases then the pros. Do bloggers always predict higher numbers? If so it's no surprise they did this time.
1. Why take a screen shot of the spreadsheet?
2. Why are there only 11 amateurs? Amateurs greatly out number pro but in this table they're a minority. Seems like sample bias to me.
3. Where is the context and the history? The bloggers all predicted larger increases then the pros. Do bloggers always predict higher numbers? If so it's no surprise they did this time.