I'm not intimate enough with any of the parties involved in this situation, so my reply will also be comfortably generic:
Yes, it's a reasonable demand. If public opinion is asking something of Apple, and its CEO chooses to answer, every aspect of the answer is open to scrutiny. Gruber indeed lists the specific evidence he would expect:
> - When was HKmap.live “used maliciously to target individual officers for violence”?
> - When was it used to “victimize individuals and property where no police are present”?
> - What local laws in Hong Kong does it violate?
It's unlikely that a CEO would be so thorough. Apple is particularly obsessed with secrecy, and tech companies in general seem to not want to disclose details when they restrict access to a product or platform.
But it's still a reasonable demand from an individual standpoint.
Yes, it's a reasonable demand. If public opinion is asking something of Apple, and its CEO chooses to answer, every aspect of the answer is open to scrutiny. Gruber indeed lists the specific evidence he would expect:
> - When was HKmap.live “used maliciously to target individual officers for violence”?
> - When was it used to “victimize individuals and property where no police are present”?
> - What local laws in Hong Kong does it violate?
It's unlikely that a CEO would be so thorough. Apple is particularly obsessed with secrecy, and tech companies in general seem to not want to disclose details when they restrict access to a product or platform.
But it's still a reasonable demand from an individual standpoint.