> So how could the readability of scientific papers be improved? First, by recognizing that good writing doesn’t happen by magic. It can be taught — but rarely is. Douglas suspects that many first drafts of papers are written by junior members of a research team who, lacking any model for what good writing looks like, take their lead from what is already in the journals. And there “they see the jargon and complexity as markers of what passes as scientific writing”, she adds. Such self-reinforcing mimicry could certainly account for the trends highlighted by Thompson and his colleagues.
This is pretty much my experience with scientific writing. No one told me how to do it, so I started copying the style from the papers and books I had at hand.
This is pretty much my experience with scientific writing. No one told me how to do it, so I started copying the style from the papers and books I had at hand.