It's ironic that you're defending RMS's remarks (in which he argued that we use accurate terminology, fair judgement, and scientific methods to evaluate evidence) by using inaccurate, disparaging, and dismissive language to attack the character of a critic. You're pretty much doing the exact opposite of what he's asking.
Good job.
Your comment reminds me of the people who come out in defense of the Catholic Church whenever someone claims they were sexually abused by a Priest.
Good job.
Your comment reminds me of the people who come out in defense of the Catholic Church whenever someone claims they were sexually abused by a Priest.