However your previous remark about Richard Dawkins opening up a Bible is a bit worrying.
It is obvious that the missing historical information is not in the Bible, and that remark can be interpreted a bit like the point of view of Jehovah witnesses, that all you need to read is the Bible.
However your previous remark about Richard Dawkins opening up a Bible is a bit worrying.
It is obvious that the missing historical information is not in the Bible, and that remark can be interpreted a bit like the point of view of Jehovah witnesses, that all you need to read is the Bible.