> How have we gotten to the point where a company that is considering a $10-46B IPO is in a position where 1/3 of its staff is redundant and can be laid off
I don't think those are contradictory to each other. And in WeWork's case, they were posed to 45B IPO, now it is down to 10B, the trajectory is now totally different, as with the staff that needed.
I don't think those are contradictory to each other. And in WeWork's case, they were posed to 45B IPO, now it is down to 10B, the trajectory is now totally different, as with the staff that needed.