After reading the article, I wonder if Doqume has plans to share back the information to Wikidata that was derived from Wikipedia that was not present in Wikidata.
I know this lessens the power of claiming they know stuff that is not available to the public, but I would think Wikidata has ways of establishing the provenance of the data, so they should get credit as well as the original Wikipedia authors.
I know this lessens the power of claiming they know stuff that is not available to the public, but I would think Wikidata has ways of establishing the provenance of the data, so they should get credit as well as the original Wikipedia authors.