> but is quick to dismiss global warming, apparently on the basis of a single webpage
Actually, he didn't. FWIW, he provided more evidence in support of his global warming skepticism than he did in support of his other skepticism, skepticism that you didn't question.
But, I'll play along. How much support should he have given for each of his arguments to satisfy you?
Actually, he didn't. FWIW, he provided more evidence in support of his global warming skepticism than he did in support of his other skepticism, skepticism that you didn't question.
But, I'll play along. How much support should he have given for each of his arguments to satisfy you?