Let me get this straight... a noteworthy CS professor points out some obvious and undeniable flaws in the current theory or protein 'evolution.' He also points out that is difficult to get serious researchers to grapple with this issue because Darwinism has turned into a dogma where people are viciously attacked if they point out some fundamental flaws with the idea.
Your response:
"Almost everything in that article is wrong "
"pseudoscientific arguments"
"Stephen Meyer is not brilliant and he is a quack"
" Computer Science professor has no business arguing about evolution"
"widely discredited and dishonest "
"known to be fundamentally dishonest"
"So it's fundamentally dishonest."
"another lie"
"fringe views"
"fringe creationist quack"
In short, you've proved his point.
Your comments -- in any other area of discussion on HN -- would probably get you flagged.
Your response:
"Almost everything in that article is wrong "
"pseudoscientific arguments"
"Stephen Meyer is not brilliant and he is a quack"
" Computer Science professor has no business arguing about evolution"
"widely discredited and dishonest "
"known to be fundamentally dishonest"
"So it's fundamentally dishonest."
"another lie"
"fringe views"
"fringe creationist quack"
In short, you've proved his point. Your comments -- in any other area of discussion on HN -- would probably get you flagged.