But I believe people have an unalienable right to tell their version of a story.
As far as these story go, this is one is very civil (and doesn't name the people that are accused of destroying a career and a life).
What I don't really understand is what this comment brings to the table. Why try to cast aspersions on an otherwise mild testimony, the truth of which is pretty much unknowable without further details?
But I believe people have an unalienable right to tell their version of a story.
As far as these story go, this is one is very civil (and doesn't name the people that are accused of destroying a career and a life).
What I don't really understand is what this comment brings to the table. Why try to cast aspersions on an otherwise mild testimony, the truth of which is pretty much unknowable without further details?
What if the person is 100% right?