I am disappointed that the author ended on a "this is bad" message for something with such clear potential for good.
Instead of tearing down, why did the author not apply the very thing he learned and use his article's influence and the power of suggestion to influence more people to use this tool positively?
Instead of tearing down, why did the author not apply the very thing he learned and use his article's influence and the power of suggestion to influence more people to use this tool positively?