someone who analyzed 200 years of data is criticizing people who analyzed 50 years of data before. and both think they can extrapolate to events that are assumed to cycle every 900-11,000 years!
all sumarized by a writer who uses star war analogies.
spare your time. don't bother reading this. Go read Foucault instead if you care for this topic.
someone who analyzed 200 years of data is criticizing people who analyzed 50 years of data before. and both think they can extrapolate to events that are assumed to cycle every 900-11,000 years!
all sumarized by a writer who uses star war analogies.
spare your time. don't bother reading this. Go read Foucault instead if you care for this topic.