> In Wednesday’s opinion, Circuit Judge Jane Richards Roth, writing for a 2-1 majority of a three-judge panel, said Amazon may be liable in part because its business model “enables third-party vendors to conceal themselves from the customer, leaving customers injured by defective products with no direct recourse to the third-party vendor.”
Seems like Amazon can just force third-party vendors to reveal their full legal identity to the customer then?
I don't care who's liable as long as someone's liable and it's fully enforceable within the US court system.
> In Wednesday’s opinion, Circuit Judge Jane Richards Roth, writing for a 2-1 majority of a three-judge panel, said Amazon may be liable in part because its business model “enables third-party vendors to conceal themselves from the customer, leaving customers injured by defective products with no direct recourse to the third-party vendor.”
Seems like Amazon can just force third-party vendors to reveal their full legal identity to the customer then?
I don't care who's liable as long as someone's liable and it's fully enforceable within the US court system.