I’m generally pro-right to repair bills but I’m not clear how far they can reasonably go - should companies that make phones or whatever with custom cpus (Apple, Samsung, etc with completely custom chips or custom configurations - arm licensees etc) be required to sell those chips freely?
I’m not trying to be unreasonable: being able to replace a broken screen without replacing the entire device is reasonable, but there must Shirley* be a line across which repair is unreasonable.
I’m not trying to be unreasonable: being able to replace a broken screen without replacing the entire device is reasonable, but there must Shirley* be a line across which repair is unreasonable.
* :D