I guess that's what happens when you leak classified information and then work with foreign adversaries.
Kind of interesting how people think this isn't espionage related. I would like to hear the argument that this is purely a first amendment case. Free speech doesn't cover the theft of dangerous, classified information and potentially treasonous activities.
Kind of interesting how people think this isn't espionage related. I would like to hear the argument that this is purely a first amendment case. Free speech doesn't cover the theft of dangerous, classified information and potentially treasonous activities.