Comment

Comment by NateEag

Am I the only one who still hosts my own static sites on a plain old virtual machine?

It's pretty simple to configure nginx for static sites, and by doing it yourself you reduce vendor lockin to just about nil.

Even if S3 is massively cheaper, $5/month for a tiny VM seems like a small price to pay for being vendor-abstract.

I suppose S3 is way less likely to suffer a meaningful outage than my little VM, but how many 9s do my personal websites actually need?

parent NateEag 7 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton