The following excerpts score quite high on my BS meter:
- "Although the purpose and meaning of the manuscript had eluded scholars for over a century, it took Research Associate Dr. Gerard Cheshire two weeks,"
- ""I experienced a series of 'eureka' moments whilst deciphering the code"
These two alone much more to discredit the "preliminary" claims than any of the remaining arguments in favor of the "discovery".
- "Although the purpose and meaning of the manuscript had eluded scholars for over a century, it took Research Associate Dr. Gerard Cheshire two weeks,"
- ""I experienced a series of 'eureka' moments whilst deciphering the code"
These two alone much more to discredit the "preliminary" claims than any of the remaining arguments in favor of the "discovery".