For people who haven't read the article this is extremely misleading:
> The ends with him agreeing how the film sucks and maybe the prosecutor was right!
He says that, only as a joke that it's so bad it should've been illegal. While in reality a great mis-justice was done to the man, and he was railroaded into accepting a plea-deal due to the gravity of the unfair charges.
> The ends with him agreeing how the film sucks and maybe the prosecutor was right!
He says that, only as a joke that it's so bad it should've been illegal. While in reality a great mis-justice was done to the man, and he was railroaded into accepting a plea-deal due to the gravity of the unfair charges.