I didn't assume that dynamic languages are more concise. I only said that each of both (with the addition of interpreted languages) usually require less tooling and less to keep in mind than their respective opposite
How much you need autocomplete and refactoring to be reliable also depends on your situation (language/framework, app structure and number of contributors).
More people use IDEs with dynamic languages because Visual Studio Code now exists so people who always prefered IDEs now have a good option
How much you need autocomplete and refactoring to be reliable also depends on your situation (language/framework, app structure and number of contributors).
More people use IDEs with dynamic languages because Visual Studio Code now exists so people who always prefered IDEs now have a good option