I have a hard time following. I don't feel well read on the topic, but your argument seems to boil down to "our thinking is so awesome, it must be magical". This strongly reminds me of creation myths where humans desperately tried to separate themselves from all other nature. But in case I'm missing something, I'd be thankful for you answering the following few questions to get me back on track:
- Do you believe that there are laws of physics we can not perceive and understand?
- If no: Why? How does it interact with usual matter and physics? Is this the unexplainable magic?
- If we can perceive and thus hopefully one day understand all laws of physics, can we simulate them?
- If, in the future, we are able to simulate all physics, what stops us from simulating the life of a human? (though likely significantly slower)
- This simulated human should react undistinguishable form a real human. Would you call this simulated human conscious?
- If yes, then where does this consciousness come from except the simulation state?
- If no, how do we know if some other being except ourself is conscious?
- Can there be two similar beings demonstrating the same behavior, but with only one of them being conscious?
- Do you believe that there are laws of physics we can not perceive and understand?
- If no: Why? How does it interact with usual matter and physics? Is this the unexplainable magic?
- If we can perceive and thus hopefully one day understand all laws of physics, can we simulate them?
- If, in the future, we are able to simulate all physics, what stops us from simulating the life of a human? (though likely significantly slower)
- This simulated human should react undistinguishable form a real human. Would you call this simulated human conscious?
- If yes, then where does this consciousness come from except the simulation state?
- If no, how do we know if some other being except ourself is conscious?
- Can there be two similar beings demonstrating the same behavior, but with only one of them being conscious?