I think the point of the article is that the science supports the fact that there are sex differences in the brain.
Ideas that the article does not propose include:
- Men are better than Women or vice versa.
- Men are better suited to X activity or job.
The point was that the science should be evidence lead and defended from ideologues regardless of your view on the broader political issues. Ideologues attempt to bend all evidence to support a pre-existing conclusion, and the politicisation of science is bad in all cases because it undermines the entire process. It's depressing that a publication such as Nature should be affected in this way.
Ideas that the article does not propose include:
- Men are better than Women or vice versa.
- Men are better suited to X activity or job.
The point was that the science should be evidence lead and defended from ideologues regardless of your view on the broader political issues. Ideologues attempt to bend all evidence to support a pre-existing conclusion, and the politicisation of science is bad in all cases because it undermines the entire process. It's depressing that a publication such as Nature should be affected in this way.