Indeed, the whole press release brings to mind a couple of points from "Engineering a Safer World" which, if you're interested in this stuff, I can't recommend enough[0].
In the section "Questioning the Foundations of Traditional Safety Engineering":
Old Assumption
Most accidents are caused by operator error. Rewarding safe behaviour and punishing unsafe behaviours will eliminate or reduce accidents significantly.
New Assumption
Operator error is a product of the environment in which it occurs. To reduce operator "error" we must change the environment in which the operator works.
And:
Old Assumption
Major accidents occur from the chance simultaneous occurrence of random events.
New Assumption
Systems will tend to migrate toward states of higher risk. Such migration is predictable and can be prevented by appropriate system design or detected during operations using leading indicators of increasing risk.
In the press release we see both the "operator error" and "random events" hand-waving. Regardless of the fiduciary duty of this man, this is just not good enough.
In the section "Questioning the Foundations of Traditional Safety Engineering":
And: In the press release we see both the "operator error" and "random events" hand-waving. Regardless of the fiduciary duty of this man, this is just not good enough.[0] Open Access PDF: https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/engineering-safer-world