I was sad to see => aka "hashrocket" syntax go, and it still slips in sometimes... but it is nice being able to use the same hash syntax in Ruby and JS.
What I'm intrigued by is the author's suggestion that there's more to the change than a relatively minor syntax change. Is there more to the story? I always assumed that both syntaxes are functionally identical.
What I'm intrigued by is the author's suggestion that there's more to the change than a relatively minor syntax change. Is there more to the story? I always assumed that both syntaxes are functionally identical.