> Some of the Old LookML syntax is an exact copy.
I met the online Looker demo a few years ago when I was looking for a business intelligence tool for another project.
Looker has a closed source code, so I did not see what algorithm is used to build queries.
I kept those LookML features that I understood and liked. However, in some places LookML is confusing (for example - references and aliases). I made them differently.
Later Looker quit using YAML.
> Very few BI products have actually surpassed 100 users at target installations. And beyond 1,000 is a real challenge that only few, and even then with a lot of assistance, can support: Tableau, Looker, Microstrategy, maybe Birst, maybe Domo.
Scaling that size is not a top priority right now.
> Also, a combination of BI with LookML is a complicated product.
You should have told me this a couple of years ago. It seemed pretty simple.
> So with all that, the question is, is it really worth the struggle?
Yes, If people will use it.
> What's the end vision for supporting this?
In future - maybe "skinny" or "thin" option mentioned here - https://medium.com/open-consensus/2-open-core-definition-exa...
>Why should someone who implements BI for a living bet on this product?
If you can not afford Looker (like me) and want to use similar product.
I met the online Looker demo a few years ago when I was looking for a business intelligence tool for another project.
Looker has a closed source code, so I did not see what algorithm is used to build queries.
I kept those LookML features that I understood and liked. However, in some places LookML is confusing (for example - references and aliases). I made them differently.
Later Looker quit using YAML.
> Very few BI products have actually surpassed 100 users at target installations. And beyond 1,000 is a real challenge that only few, and even then with a lot of assistance, can support: Tableau, Looker, Microstrategy, maybe Birst, maybe Domo.
Scaling that size is not a top priority right now.
> Also, a combination of BI with LookML is a complicated product.
You should have told me this a couple of years ago. It seemed pretty simple.
> So with all that, the question is, is it really worth the struggle?
Yes, If people will use it.
> What's the end vision for supporting this?
In future - maybe "skinny" or "thin" option mentioned here - https://medium.com/open-consensus/2-open-core-definition-exa...
>Why should someone who implements BI for a living bet on this product?
If you can not afford Looker (like me) and want to use similar product.